|
EVIDENCES OF A FLOOD
by
Gerald Durr
As I travel from place to place
in Franklin County, I often marvel at the variety of geological
features I see: deep canyons and coulees, gravel mounds, a beautiful
waterfall, basalt rock outcroppings, river valleys, and flat,
fertile farmlands. These interesting and some times
unusual features have raised questions in my mind. I like to ask,
"How did that rock get there?" or, "What kind of force made that
valley with such steep sides?" These questions have led me to
investigate the geology of Franklin County.
In this report, I would like to describe some of the unusual
features found in Franklin County, look at the currently accepted
theory of their origins, and then briefly evaluate that geological
theory in light of the evidence available.
My interest in the local geology was first aroused when
traveling in the area around Connell, Washington. I lived in Connell
for five years, so I became very familiar with the landscape in that
area. Thus we will begin our study in Connell.
The Coulees. Whether
approaching Connell from the north, south, east, or west, it is
necessary to descend a long slope. All of the surrounding land is at
1000 to 1100 feet elevation,3 but Connell lies in the
bottom of a gully at 850 to 900 feet. This gully is the intersection
of three coulees - Providence Coulee to the north, Washtucna Coulee
to the east, and Esquatzel Coulee to the south.4
Providence Coulee is deep and narrow, with V-shaped, hilly sides.
Washtucna Coulee is deep and about a mile wide, with grassy
rangeland at the bottom and steeply sloping, somewhat rounded basalt
cliffs at the sides. Esquatzel Coulee is very deep, with bare basalt
cliffs at the sides.
Providence Coulee has a small stream at the bottom. It flows
through the middle of Connell, enters Esquatzel Coulee to the south,
and continues on until it reaches Pasco. This small stream is a home
for cattails and frogs. Farther down the coulee, it provides water
for grazing cattle. Just before reaching Pasco, the water is drawn
off into the
Esquatzel
Diversion Channel and carried to the Columbia River. The coulee
itself loses its impressive basalt walls when it reaches Eltopia,
then becomes just a small gully until the land around it flattens
out into a plain just north of the Pasco Airport.
Highway 260 runs along the southern lip of Washtucna Coulee
on its way to Kahlotus. This widest of the three coulees doesn't
have a stream running in it, but it does have two lakes that are
gradually drying out, called Sulphur Lake and Lake Kahlotus. Lake
Kahlotus is 865 feet above sea level. I've spoken to residents of
Kahlotus who said that Lake Kahlotus has shrunk in the past 30
years. It once was a good fishing spot, but now it hardly has enough
water for a fish to live in. At first I asked, "Where did all the
water go?" But then, upon further thought, I had to ask, "Where did
the water come from in the first place?" There is no apparent stream
or other source.
Gravel Bars. Also found in Washtucna Coulee are several
very large gravel bars.5 So me
of these have ripple marks along their tops. How did that gravel get
there?
Devil's Canyon. Just south
of Kahlotus, Highway 263 enters Devil's Canyon. This is a
steep-sided, V-shaped canyon that descends 400 feet in four miles.
Its sides are made of basalt rock, with much talus, or broken rock,
covering the slopes. Devil's Canyon ends at the Snake River. The
Snake River above Lower Monumental Dam has an elevation of 540 feet.
As I drove down the canyon one day, I wondered if it could
have been made by running water. The problem is, there was no
apparent source of water. From Kahlotus, elevation 865 feet, the
road climbs to 1000 feet before descending into Devil's Canyon. That
means that the canyon has a barrier at its upper end. How
could
the water rise 135 feet in order to enter the canyon?
You may have noticed that we just moved from a coulee to a
canyon. Actually, both words mean the same thing. When the
French-Canadian fur traders were exploring the Columbia Basin, they
noticed that there were many dry gullies with steep sides. They
called these gullies "coulees," and the French name became commonly
used in Eastern Washington. "Canyon," on the other hand, is a
Spanish word meaning "a narrow chasm with steep cliff walls, formed
by running water; a gorge."6 This word became a familiar
word in the English language because of the many canyons in our
nation's Southwest, where Spanish missionaries and Mexican settlers
named the geographic features.
Although "canyon" and "coulee" mean almost the same thing,
there are some very noticeable differences between Devil's Canyon
and Washtucna Coulee. Devil's Canyon is V-shaped, and the canyon
floor descends rapidly (roughly 100 feet per mile). Washtucna Coulee
is box-shaped, with vertical sides and flat bottom. It descends only
about 200 feet in 32 miles (roughly 6 feet per mile).
Let's continue heading northeastward from Kahlotus up
Washtucna Coulee. Eventually we would reach Washtucna, at the upper
end of the coulee. There the elevation is 1014 feet. But Washtucna
is about a mile north of the Franklin County border, so we won't
discuss it in this report. I would, however, like to describe
another fascinating geological feature near that town.

Palouse Falls. If we were to turn east onto Highway 26
at Washtucna, we would soon be driving alongside the Palouse River.
The Palouse River flows out of Idaho, passes through the towns of
Palouse and Colfax, and meanders through the Palouse Hills. It forms
a part of the border between Whitman and Adams Counties. Then, about
3˝ miles east of Washtucna, at the very eastern border of Franklin
County, this lazy, meandering river makes a sharp turn southward and
flows in a straight line over rapids and falls for four miles. Then
it makes a 185-foot plunge over Palouse Falls.7 Here the
basalt walls are vertical cliffs. You can clearly see the various
layers of basalt, with their colonnades and entablatures.
When I see a sudden change in the earth's features, I like to
ask why. Why did a lazy, meandering river suddenly become a rushing
rapids flowing as straight as a stick for four miles? And what made
that river suddenly fall 185 feet, then again meander calmly down to
the Snake River?
The basalt cliffs near Palouse Falls have a curious tendency
to make sharp, 90° turns.8 There is a deep canyon that
cuts a perpendicular line across the river gorge just south of the
falls.9 What geologic force has cut those canyons so
straight and at such remarkable angles?
Ringold Basin. About 18 miles to the southwest of
Connell is the town of Basin City. Basin City is located in Ringold
Basin - a U-shaped depression with steep slopes on both sides. These
steep hillsides are over 100 feet high and covered with desert
vegetation. In places the hillside is breaking off and sliding away.
The slopes begin about 5 miles south of Othello and run southward
past Basin City to Ringold and the Columbia River, a distance of
about 15 miles. The slopes make me think of a dike alongside a
river. But the only water in sight is a small stream.
The Erratics. Basin City
is built on gravel beds. Local farmers sometimes find huge boulders
in their fields - not just the basalt rock that we would expect in
this area, but granite and metamorphic rock as well. These
unusual
rocks must have come from far away in the mountains. Geologists can
trace them to their source in the Okanogan Highlands or even the
Rocky Mountains. Since these rocks are out of place here in the
Pasco Basin, they are called erratics. How did such large boulders
move here from so far away?
The Upland Flats.
Now let's look at some rather
unremarkable features in Franklin County. It took me years to notice
them, because they seem so ordinary. These are the upland "flats."
We will begin in Pasco and travel northward.
When you turn north off of I-82 onto Road 68, the road is
straight and level for 2˝ m iles.
Where the road forks at Douglas Fruits, you veer off to the right
onto Taylor Flats Road. For 2˝ more miles, the road winds back and
forth, passing through some undisturbed sagebrush and undulating,
wavy hills. For the next 4 miles, the road goes gently up and down,
crossing hills and gullies and slowly rising in elevation. Between
Sagemoor Road and Cypress Drive, the road climbs steeply.
Finally, at the top of the hill, the land flattens out. At
night I can see headlights appear two miles away and know that a car
has just passed Elm Road. The road is flat and straight for those
two miles, not varying more than 20 feet in elevation. But beyond
the small hump at Elm
Road, the "flats" go on for another four miles, until Taylor Flats
Road ends at Eltopia-Ringold Road. These upland flats are not the
Taylor Flats, which are found alongside the Columbia River, but I
call them the "flats" because of their similarity to the Paradise
Flats between Connell and Othello.
You may be asking, "What is so unusual about a flat area?" At
first I saw nothing unusual
about
this area, until I began to see others like it. The Taylor Flats
plateau has an elevation of almost exactly 900 feet. When you drive
on Highway 395 northeastward toward Mesa, you will see that Mesa is
at the bottom of Esquatzel Coulee. Its elevation is 675 feet. But up
above Mesa are steep hillsides. If you look around the horizon, you
will see that the land above Mesa flattens out into a plateau. Its
elevation is 930 feet.
Continuing farther to the northeast on Highway 395, we come
again to Connell. The road to Connell is lined with basalt
outcroppings and deep gullies. If you look through the gullies
toward the west, you can see that they empty into the Esquatzel
Coulee. The far walls of the coulee are visible from the road in
some places, but the floor of the coulee is far below and out of
sight. (The walls are roughly 200 feet high.) It seems that these
gullies must be washouts, draining the water from the nearby fields
into the Coulee. But there is no water in sight. The gullies are
dry. This is an example of channeled scablands.
As you approach Connell, you can actually see the town from
several miles away. There is a flat spot on Highway 395, and it
lines up with Esquatzel Coulee so that you can see Connell down in
its gully.
I have noticed an unusual feature in the topography of
Connell - there are two "shelves." Above the floor of the coulee,
there is a hill, and then a shelf. Connell High School sits on this
shelf. Its elevation is 900 feet - the same elevation as the "flats"
above Pasco. Then there is another hillside above the high school,
so steep that nothing is built or grown on it. Above this upper
hillside, the land flattens out, and once again, the horizon looks
flat. This area is at approximately 1000-1100 feet and is called
Paradise Flats.10
It seems that the land levels out above Connell on each side.
Across Esquatzel Coulee to the west, the land looks to be the same
elevation as Paradise Flats to the north. Across Washtucna Coulee to
the northeast, it seems to be flat and on the same level as Paradise
Flats. There seems to be a pattern here - and again I must ask,
"Why?"
III. THE GEOLOGISTS EXPLAIN
Let's look at what the geologists
say. "In a sense, geologists are much like detectives: Although they
were not present when an event occurred, they must collect and piece
together physical evidence and must fit this evidence into a logical
and 'most likely' scenario of what occurred at the scene. They must
then convince their peers that their theory is the most believable
one among several possibly conflicting theories."11
The Bretz Floods. A
geologist named J. Harlen Bretz explored the dry coulees of Eastern
Washington beginning in 1919. As he wondered at the geological
marvels of Dry Falls, Grand Coulee, and the Potholes, it seemed to
him that these features had to have been made by enormous volumes of
water flowing across the land in the distant past.12
Although at first he didn't know where the water could have come
from, he published a scientific paper in which he proposed his
theory of widespread flooding in the Columbia Basin. Other
geologists did not immediately accept his theory, but Bretz
continued his explorations throughout the next several decades,
gradually accumulating enough data to convince the scientific
community that his theory was accurate.
Lake Missoula. It remained
for other geologists to find the source of the waters that caused
the flooding and devastation in the Columbia Basin. The current
theory is that a lobe of glacial ice blocked the flow of the Clark
Fork River in western Montana about 12,000 years ago. The dammed-up
river then filled all of the valleys behind it to a depth of 2,000
feet.13 This vast reservoir of water, named Lake Missoula
by the geology "detectives," then suddenly broke through the ice dam
and emptied out within a matter of days. Such a tremendous release
of water had a devastating effect downstream on the landscape of
Idaho and Eastern Washington. It scoured away the topsoil and then
carved deep channels into the bedrock. The deluge eventually drained
away down the Columbia River to the Pacific Ocean. Geologist Bretz
coined the term "channeled scablands" to describe this flood-scoured
landscape.
Basalt Rock Features. And
how did the water cut through solid rock? Much of Eastern Washington
is underlain by extensive basalt flows - volcanic lava that spilled
out of fissures of the earth in the distant past and flowed like
syrup to fill the Columbia Basin. When basalt lava cools, it hardens
and cracks into a column-shaped rock. The many cracks form a natural
weakness in the rock structure. When rapidly moving water flows in
abundance over these rocks, the water actually separates the rocks
at their weakest points and lifts them into its stream. When the
loosened rocks are propelled in the current, they can become a
battering ram capable of smashing other rocks apart.
Flood Velocities. The Ice
Age Floods are estimated to have had velocities in some places of as
much as 75 feet per second (50 miles per hour). "If the velocity of
a stream is doubled, its ability to move material along the bottom
increases up to 64 times."14 Geologists estimate that the
glacial floodwaters reached a height of 1000 feet above the rock
surface in some places. This volume and velocity of water could move
huge boulders for hundreds of miles.
Geologists believe that the waters of Lake Missoula divided
into several channels. One of these channels flowed southward from
Cheney toward Pasco, crossing over Palouse Falls and eventually
reaching the Snake River. They believe that Washtucna Coulee was
once the channel of the Palouse River, flowing from east to west.
But when the glacial floods flowed southward across the area, they
cut a new channel for the Palouse River, a shortcut to the Snake
River. This forever altered the course of the Palouse. That's why
the Palouse River turns suddenly southward near Washtucna and flows
over Palouse Falls on its way to the Snake River.
A smaller channel of the glacial floods flowed south-southwest
through Providence Coulee. There it met the Palouse River at Connell
and flowed down Esquatzel Coulee to Pasco.
Overflow Channels. During
the height of the flood, Washtucna Coulee was filled to overflowing.
There was so much water that it spilled over the top at Kahlotus and
ran rapidly down the slope to the Snake River, forming Devil's
Canyon. This overflow, however, didn't cut all the way through the
rock at the side of Washtucna Coulee, so the entrance to Devil's
Canyon is still approximately 135 feet above the floor of the
coulee.
A much larger flow of glacial waters made its way south past
Othello, scooped out the Ringold Basin, and joined the waters of the
Columbia. It left huge gravel deposits at Basin City and the Ringold
area.
IV. EVALUATION OF THE FLOOD THEORY
The evidence of a flood is
irrefutable. Dry coulees, huge gravel bars, giant ripple marks, and
erratic boulders all point to enormous volumes of water flowing at
great speeds. But I have a few unanswered questions that beg for an
answer. The main question I will deal with in this report is "What
created the flatlands?"
The Flatlands Question.
The coulees were formed by the raging floodwaters of Lake Missoula.
The floods washed out Ringold Basin. Many gullies visible above the
Columbia River were formed by water drainage off the plateau
farmlands. There's a pattern here - running water causes gullies and
depressions.

Geologists say that the Palouse
Hills to the east of Franklin County are rolling hills made of
"loess." Loess is wind-blown silt. The Juniper Dunes northeast of
Pasco are sand dunes, caused by the gradual movement of wind-blown
sand.15 There's a pattern here, too - when the landscape
is dominated by wind-blown materials, it is hilly.
But what causes flatlands? Is it reasonable to assume that
they were "caused" by a geological force, just as the hills and the
gullies were caused by known forces?
Although I haven't found any explanation written by a
geologist, I think I can guess what causes flatlands. It appears to
me that the upper flatlands have some of the best, most fertile
soil. It seems that moving air or water doesn't flatten the land,
but tends to "rough up" the land. The silty soil that is so common
in the Pasco area is easily moved by running water. Ripple marks,
whether on the beach or in the gravels of Washtucna Coulee, are made
by running water. Therefore, I would guess that the flatlands were
formed by sediments settling out of calm waters.
Immediately, my hypothesis raises a big question. There are
flatlands at 900 feet elevation just 14 miles north of Pasco. Across
Ringold Basin, about 20 miles north of Pasco, there are flatlands on
the Wahluke Slope, also at 900 feet elevation. Above Mesa there are
flatlands at 930 feet elevation. Above Connell, 35 miles northeast
of Pasco, there are flatlands at 1000 to 1100 feet elevation. All of
these areas are separated by coulees and basins said to be cut out
by the Missoula Floods. If this is true, then all of the areas I've
mentioned must have been connected before the floods. That's a huge
amount of real estate, very flat, gently sloping from north to
south, and all at 900 to 1100 feet of elevation. Could there have
been a body of water big enough to cover that extensive area? The
geologists say yes.
Lake Lewis. About 12 miles
south of Pasco, the Columbia River flows through a narrow gap in the
Horse Heaven Hills. This opening is called Wallula Gap. The
geologists say that during the Ice Age Floods, the floodwaters
reached the Horse Heaven Hills and began to back up behind Wallula
Gap, because the water couldn't drain through the gap quickly
enough. They say that a temporary lake, called Lake Lewis, was
formed as the waters backed up and then drained through the
constriction. Lake Lewis was supposed to have risen up to 1250 feet
elevation at the peak of the floods, and then drained out within a
week or two.16
That sounds like a lot of moving water. On the beach, when a
gently flowing stream or a wave washes across the sand, it leaves
ripples. There are no ripples on the upland "flats" I've mentioned.
How could the waters of the Ice Age Floods have overflowed these
flat areas and left them still flat? It seems to me that a vast,
high, calm lake must have made the "flats".
I attended a geology lecture and field at Columbia Basin
College in Pasco, Washington. The lecturer, a geologist at Battelle
Pacific Northwest National Laboratories in Richland, Washington,
made some interesting comments. After explaining a geologist's
interpretation of the Columbia Basin's natural features, he asked
the students, "Do you believe that?" I think he was inviting us to
question the geological detective work. He also told us at the end
of the lecture, "In ten years, they'll teach all of this different."
When a geologist "reads the rocks" and "pieces together the
evidence," he or she forms a hypothesis to explain the evidence.
Sometimes the pieces don't all fit together. Sometimes there are
questions left unanswered.
V. CONCLUSIONS
Everyone who studies science
approaches it with some preconceived notions. Geologist J. Harlen
Bretz was severely criticized and rejected by his colleagues when he
postulated a cataclysmic flood.17 The idea of "Catastrophism"
had been thrown out and ridiculed in the 100 years since James
Hutton first proposed his theory of Uniformitarianism. Before
Hutton, the general consensus in the Western Hemisphere was that the
Bible was true and fully reliable. But Hutton challenged the
authority of the Bible and tried to make people doubt its
credibility. It took over a hundred years, but with the help of many
like-minded intellectuals over the next century, Hutton's theory
gained acceptance.
So the geologists of Bretz' day were shocked and offended to
hear that their colleague had the audacity to believe that a vast
flood had rapidly changed the face of the earth. It was unthinkable!
It was unacceptable! Their predecessors had worked hard to root out
the common people's belief in a worldwide flood. By the early
1900's, most geologists had rejected the idea of a biblical flood.
They weren't prepared to tolerate a new flood theory.
I wonder why those scientists were so upset. Isn't "science"
a search for truth? If new evidence of a flood came to light, why
were they so adamant that it couldn't be possible? It seems that
they weren't as interested in a search for truth as in defending
what they believed.
This report began with a thought-provoking quotation from the
video production "Sculpted by Floods: The Northwest's Ice Age
Legacy." It said, "This is the tale of how the Northwest was once
changed by geologic catastrophe on a biblical scale." I like that
thought. But let's keep the record straight: the tale of the
Missoula Floods isn't on a biblical scale. When the Bible speaks of
a great flood, it says this:"The same day were all the fountains
of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights….And the
waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and the
ark went upon the face of the waters. And the waters prevailed
exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under
the whole heaven, were covered. Fifteen cubits upward did the waters
prevail; and the mountains were covered." (Genesis 7:11-12,
18-20) In the biblical account, the floodwaters covered the whole
earth, including all the hills and mountains. Is it possible that
Lake Missoula could have been a remnant of a flood that once covered
the whole earth?
I invite you to consider the possibility that the Bible may
be true. We have no eyewitnesses and no written records of the Ice
Age Floods. But we do have a written record of a worldwide flood.
Before researching the Missoula Floods, I had looked at the geologic
features of Franklin County and hypothesized that a great lake had
once covered this area - a calm lake. I thought that perhaps the
lake existed before Wallula Gap was carved out. Perhaps the biblical
floodwaters remained in the Columbia Basin until the pressure of
such a vast lake could carve through a weak spot in the Horse Heaven
Hills. This way, the waters would drain off slowly, leaving flat,
undisturbed plateaus of fertile, silty soils. Now, even after
studying about the Ice Age Floods theory, I think that my hypothesis
fits the observable facts. I admit that I have a bias - some
preconceived notions. Doesn't everyone? What you think? Your
preconceived notions will determine what you believe and how you
live. |